International Journal of Linguistics Applied Psychology and Technology (IJLAPT) https://ijlapt.strjournals.com/index.php/ijlapt <p><strong>International Journal of Linguistics Applied Psychology and Technology (IJLAPT) (Online ISSN: 3048-4529) </strong>is a Double-blind Peer reviewed (Refereed) <strong>Monthly journal</strong> dedicated to publishing high-quality research articles in the fields of Linguistics, Applied Psychology and Technology. Our mission is to foster the dissemination of cutting-edge knowledge and promote advancements in these interdisciplinary areas.</p> <p><strong>Our Journal:</strong></p> <p align="justify">The <strong>International Journal of Linguistics Applied Psychology and Technology (IJLAPT) </strong>is an esteemed open-access journal that provides a platform for researchers, academicians, and industry professionals to share their expertise, findings, and innovations. We publish original research papers, reviews, case studies and technical notes that contribute to the advancement of Linguistics, Applied Psychology and Technology in <strong>print and online mode</strong>.</p> <p><strong>Our Focus Areas:</strong></p> <p><strong>1. Linguistics:</strong></p> <p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal;">Linguistics is the scientific study of language. We welcome submissions that explore various applications of scientific study of linguistics- i.e., Phonology - the study of speech sounds in their cognitive aspects, Morphology - the study of the formation of words, Syntax - the study of the formation of sentences, Semantics - the study of meaning, Pragmatics - the study of language, literary, grammatical, palaeographical, structural cognitive, social, cultural, psychological, environmental, biological. This includes but is not limited to psycholinguistics (the psychology of language acquisition and use); historical linguistics and the history of languages; applied linguistics (using linguistic knowledge to help in real-world situations like language teaching); sociolinguistics, varieties of English, discourse analysis and conversation.</span></strong></p> <p><strong>2. Applied Psychology:</strong></p> <p align="justify">We encourage submissions related to all branches of applied psychology including educational psychology, industrial psychology, criminal psychology, forensic psychology, engineering psychology, sports psychology, clinical psychology, counselling services, medicinal psychology, and forensic psychology. We aim to disseminate research that addresses real-world Applied Psychology challenges and presents novel solutions.</p> <p><strong>3. Technology:</strong></p> <p align="justify">We invite contributions that investigate different technologies related to any field practices, strategies, and innovations in different industries, systems and organizations. This includes areas which uses all kind of intelligent and recent techniques for human well-being by new innovations with secure technological aspects whether it be in the field of Engineering, management, Science, education or health.</p> en-US editor.ijlapt@strjournals.com (Editor-in-Chief) strpublication@gmail.com (Technical support) Mon, 04 May 2026 07:41:11 +0000 OJS 3.3.0.7 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Children’s Sentiment Analysis From Texts by Using Weight Updated Tuned With Random Forest Classification https://ijlapt.strjournals.com/index.php/ijlapt/article/view/284 <p><em>The sentiment analysis of children is fundamental to understand the emotional responses in literary narratives, where significant implications are made in terms of educational and therapeutic use. Traditional text classification models, which include Bi-LSTM, Decision Tree, and ensemble models, are often characterized by reduced accuracy that can be explained by low data quality, overfitting, and inadequate optimization of hyperparameters. This paper uses a sentiment-annotated 4,000 short stories dataset. The preprocessing pipeline included the cleansing of the text, the process of breaking down into sentences and the removal of unnecessary symbols to standardize the inputs. An eight-layer LSTM network was used to perform feature extraction followed by dimensionality reduction using PCA and Truncated SVD. Classical machine learning models were trained simultaneously with a transformer-based ELECTRA model using weighted cross-entropy loss to counter class imbalance, including Random Forest and Decision Tree. The accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score were used to evaluate the performance of the model, with ELECTRA achieving the best scores in each of the measures (93.4%). Flask-based web interface was created to enable interactive user input, prediction and presentation of sentiment results. The explainable AI approaches, LIME and SHAP were used to clarify predictions at the feature level, providing transparency and actionable insights. This approach has a significant improvement in anticipated precision and interpretation as opposed to traditional methods.</em></p> Dr D V Nagarjana Devi, P Rama Venkata s s Durga Copyright (c) 2026 All articles published in this journal are lincensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://ijlapt.strjournals.com/index.php/ijlapt/article/view/284 Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000 A Review of Reducing Bias and Improving Feedback Through Organisational Psychology https://ijlapt.strjournals.com/index.php/ijlapt/article/view/285 <p><em>Feedback is essential for both personal and organisational performance; however, cognitive and structural biases consistently compromise its accuracy, acceptance, and developmental efficacy. This article integrates empirical and theoretical insights from organisational psychology to analyse the functioning of bias within feedback processes—encompassing source, message, recipient, and context—and to explore how evidence-based interventions can alleviate these distortions. Utilising dual-process theories of judgement, social identity theory, and attribution models, I contend that bias is not simply a noise to be eradicated but a systematic pattern emerging from cognitive efficiency and social dynamics. To effectively debias, you need to use strategies at different levels. These include individual reflective practices, structured feedback systems (like behaviourally anchored rating scales and 360-degree systems), and changes in the culture of the organization that make it safer and more focused on learning. The article critically assesses methodological constraints in current bias-reduction research.</em></p> Wing Cheung TANG Copyright (c) 2026 All articles published in this journal are lincensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 https://ijlapt.strjournals.com/index.php/ijlapt/article/view/285 Mon, 04 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000